Initiating the Literary Translation Process: A Research-Based Framework for Translating a Book from a Native Language (L1) into a Target Language (L2)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.1.18Keywords:
literary translation, book translation, translation process, translation brief, skopos theory, revision, translation norms, translator workflowAbstract
Starting a book-translation project involves more than bilingual transfer; it is an organized decision-making process that integrates purpose, readership, genre constraints, research, and revision cycles. This paper proposes a practical, research-based framework for initiating the translation process of a book from a translator’s native language (L1) to a target language (L2), drawing on functionalist approaches (purpose and brief), descriptive norms, and professional quality practices (Nord, 1997; Toury, 1995; ISO, 2015). Using an integrative literature review and synthesis method, the study maps “start-up” activities briefing, rights and scope alignment, source-text analysis, resource building, style decisions, and workflow design onto established translation theories and process research. Key contributions include a staged initiation model (Preparation → Analytical Reading → Resource & Style Infrastructure → Pilot Translation → Workflow Finalization), and a set of decision tools (translation brief checklist, character/voice sheet, terminology policy, consistency plan) aligned with widely discussed concepts such as skopos, norms, domestication/foreignization, and revision ethics (Vermeer, 1989; Venuti, 1995). The paper concludes that early-phase rigor reduces later inconsistencies, improves stylistic coherence, and supports accountable creativity especially crucial in long-form narrative where voice, cohesion, and cultural positioning must remain stable across hundreds of pages (Landers, 2001; Baker, 1992).
Downloads
References
Baker, M. (1992). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.
Baker, M. (1995). Corpora in translation studies: An overview and some suggestions for future research. Target, 7(2), 223–243.
Bassnett, S. (2014). Translation studies (4th ed.). Routledge.
Qani, M. I. (2024). TEACHING LANGUAGES FOR TRANSLATION STUDENTS IN MULTILINGUAL COUNTRIES. ББК 81.18+ 71 П44, 146.
Berman, A. (1992). The experience of the foreign: Culture and translation in romantic Germany (S. Heyvaert, Trans.). SUNY Press. (Original work published 1984)
Bowker, L. (2002). Computer-aided translation technology: A practical introduction. University of Ottawa Press.
Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of translation: The spread of ideas in translation theory. John Benjamins.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. Longman.
Hermans, T. (1999). Translation in systems: Descriptive and system-oriented approaches explained. St. Jerome.
ISO. (2015). ISO 17100:2015 Translation services—Requirements for translation services. International Organization for Standardization.
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Harvard University Press.
Jakobsen, A. L. (2003). Effects of think aloud on translation speed, revision, and segmentation. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process oriented research (pp. 69–95). John Benjamins.
Qani, M., I. (2025). Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness of Alien Terms Interference in a Culture of Multilingual Counties. OA J Applied Sci Technol, 3(1), 01-04.
Landers, C. E. (2001). Literary translation: A practical guide. Multilingual Matters.
Mossop, B. (2020). Revising and editing for translators (4th ed.). Routledge.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Brill.
Nord, C. (1997). Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. St. Jerome.
Qani, M. I. (2023). HOW TO ENHANCE CROSS-CULTURAL COMPETENCES IN THE MULTICULTURAL COUNTRIES.
Pym, A. (2010). Exploring translation theories. Routledge.
Robinson, D. (2012). Becoming a translator: An introduction to the theory and practice of translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428.
Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins.
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.
Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and commission in translational action. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 173–187). Oy Finn Lectura.
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation (J. C. Sager & M.-J. Hamel, Trans.). John Benjamins. (Original work published 1958)
Zanettin, F. (2012). Translation-driven corpora: Corpus resources for descriptive and applied translation studies. St. Jerome.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Ibrahim Qani, Dr. Sc. Tatiana Ivanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
10.55544/ijrah
editor@ijrah.com | 
+91-8874396939
This work is licensed under a 