Queer Crossings: Decoding LGBTQ+ Representations Across Disparate Cultural Landscapes

Authors

  • Dr. Sageera M. P. Associate Professor, PG & Research Department of English, Govt. College Malappuram, Malappuram - 676509, Kerala, INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.1.26

Keywords:

LGBTQ, Colonial queering, Vedas, identity, gender

Abstract

The queer subject emerges with strikingly diverse connotations across global cultures, revealing a spectrum from pervasive unease to unqualified embrace. In Abrahamic traditions, particularly Christianity, homosexuality is branded a sin—an "abomination" per Leviticus—fueling historical and ongoing marginalization of LGBTQ+ communities. Conversely, Eastern philosophies like Buddhism and Hinduism eschew explicit condemnation; the Vedas affirm a "third sex" (tritiya prakriti), evident in figures like hijras and Ardhanarishvara, where gender fluidity aligns with Judith Butler's notion of gender performativity in Gender Trouble (1990). Puranic narratives exemplify this: Vishnu's Mohini avatar and Arjuna's Brihannala guise transcend anatomical determinism, treating gender as a performative act infused with rasa (aesthetic emotion) rather than rigid ontology. Yet, not all cultures conceive gender as malleable performance. Biblical literalism in Christian polities entrenched heteronormativity, often violently policing queer expressions. This paper interrogates how colonial encounters—British imperialism's export of Victorian morality to colonized Asia, for instance—reconfigured indigenous gender epistemologies, suppressing precolonial fluidity (as in Mughal-era courtesan cultures or temple hijra roles) and imposing binaries that persist in postcolonial nation-states. Through comparative analysis of religious texts, epic literatures, and historical records, this study decodes similarities and divergences in sexual/gender categories, practices, and meanings across Oriental and Occidental contexts. It extends to contemporary ramifications, including filmic adaptations and legal shifts like India's Section 377 repeal. Ultimately, it argues for a transcultural queer hermeneutics that recovers performative traditions, challenging Eurocentric narratives and advocating ethical pluralism amid globalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B, A. (2013). “‘A volatile alliance’: Queer Sinophone synergies across literature, film, and culture.” In Queer sinophone cultures (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203590928-9

Beauvoir, S. de. (2011). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Vintage. (Original work published 1949)

Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. (Original work published 1990)

Gerber, P. (2018, August 9). Is the criminalisation of homosexuality in the Commonwealth a relic of the British Empire? Monash University. https://www.monash.edu/news/opinions/is-the-criminalisation-of-homosexuality-in-the-commonwealth-a-relic-of-the-british-empire

Human Rights Watch. (2008). "This alien legacy": The origins of "sodomy" laws in British colonialism. https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/12/17/alien-legacy/origins-sodomy-laws-british-colonialism

Kole, S. K. (2007). Globalizing queer? AIDS, homophobia and the politics of sexual identity in India. Global Change and Human Development, 8(1), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160701666269

Martin, F. (2010). Crossing genders, crossing cultures. In Queer style (pp. 1–20). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350050723.ch-006

Oyěwùmí, O. (1997). The invention of women: Making an African sense of western gender discourses. University of Minnesota Press.

Patton, C., & Sanchez-Eppler, B. (Eds.). (2014). Queer cities, queer cultures: Europe since 1945. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474210898.0006

Purohit, P. (2024). Section 377 IPC and the omission of parallel sections in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: Legal ramifications. Pahuja Law Academy. https://www.pahujalawacademy.com/section-377-ipc-and-the-omission-of-parallel-sections-in-bhartiya-nayay-sanhita-legal-ramificat

Ruth, V., & Kidwai, S. (2000). Same-sex love in India: Readings from literature and history. Penguin Books.

Smith, R. A. (2023). Khajuraho temples: An expression of sexual desires. Pratisandhi. https://www.pratisandhi.com/khajuraho-temples-an-expression-of-sexual-desires/

Vanita, R. (2002). Queer eros: Writing the Indian subcontinent. In Same-sex love in India (pp. 1–40). St. Martin's Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

M. P., S. (2026). Queer Crossings: Decoding LGBTQ+ Representations Across Disparate Cultural Landscapes. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 170–173. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.1.26