The Socio-Economic Consequences of Colonial Market Integration in Kamrup, 1860-1947
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.1.40Keywords:
Kamrup, colonial Assam, market integration, Guwahati, agrarian commercialization, river trade, colonial urbanismAbstract
This article examines the socio-economic consequences of colonial market integration in Kamrup between 1860 and 1947. Existing scholarship on colonial Assam has been shaped largely by studies of tea, migration, frontier governance, and provincial politics. Although these works have transformed the field, they have left an analytical gap at the district level, especially in relation to how market integration altered agrarian life, urban growth, social hierarchy, and cultural practice in Kamrup. This article addresses that gap by treating market integration not as a neutral expansion of trade but as a historical process through which colonial power reorganized circulation, revenue, labor, and everyday life. Methodologically, it adopts a conceptual historical approach, synthesizing the Kamrup district gazetteer, work on nineteenth-century Assam's political economy, recent scholarship on commerce and river transport, studies of Guwahati's colonial market geography, and literature on print, migration, and social differentiation in colonial Assam. The article argues that colonial market integration in Kamrup had a double effect. It expanded connectivity through waterways, bazaars, municipal planning, and commercial circuits, but it also deepened uneven development by monetizing peasant life, strengthening merchant and intermediary groups, reordering urban space, and producing new forms of social and cultural stratification. Kamrup did not simply become "more commercial." It was reconstituted as a nodal district within an imperial economy whose benefits and burdens were distributed unequally. The article contributes to the historiography of colonial northeastern India by showing that the district scale is crucial for understanding how economic integration generated durable social consequences.
Downloads
References
Allen, B. C. (1905). Assam district gazetteers: Vol. IV, Kamrup. Pioneer Press.
Barua, T. M. (2021). Markets and the city: Planning interventions and markets in Guwahati city, India. Journal of Urban Culture Research, 23, 256-272. https://doi.org/10.14456/jucr.2021.31
Bhuyan, R., & Deka, S. P. (2023). Print modernity in colonial Assam. Lexington Books.
Goswami, P. (1999). Assam in the nineteenth century: Industrialisation and colonial penetration. Spectrum Publications.
Guha, A. (2014). Planter Raj to Swaraj: Freedom struggle and electoral politics in Assam (4th ed.). Tulika Books.
Iqbal, I. (2015). The space between nation and empire: The making and unmaking of Eastern Bengal and Assam Province, 1905-1911. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814001661
Medhi, H. (2023). Introduction. In Gendered publics: Chandraprava Saikiani and the Mahila Samiti in colonial Assam (pp. 1-39). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199482900.003.0001
Saikia, A. (2010). Landlords, tenants and agrarian relations: Revisiting a peasant uprising in colonial Assam. Studies in History, 26(2), 175-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/025764301002600203
Sharma, J. (2011). Empire's garden: Assam and the making of India. Duke University Press.
Sharma, N. (2019). Commerce, merchants and markets in the Brahmaputra Valley c. 1800-1900. International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah, 7(11), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i11.2020.351
Sharma, N. (2022). Commodities trade, river transport and colonialism: The Brahmaputra river valley in the nineteenth century. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 59(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194646211065355
Sharma, N. (2025). Commerce, political economy and ecology in Northeast India: Assam, c. 1826-1905. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shiladitya Das, Dr. Pradeep Kumar Kesharwani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.















