Digital Public Sphere, Identity, and Silence: A Qualitative Multi-Study Analysis of Political Opinion Formation in Kohima, Nagaland

Authors

  • Dr. Abel Kavahru Assistant Professor (Sociology), Don Bosco College, Kohima, Nagaland - 797001, INDIA
  • Ms. Mengutuonuo Solo Postgraduate Student (Sociology), Don Bosco College, Kohima, Nagaland - 797001, INDIA
  • Mr. Petevilie Pienyu Postgraduate Student (Sociology), Don Bosco College, Kohima, Nagaland - 797001, INDIA
  • Mr. Athenba L. Sangtam Postgraduate Student (Sociology), Don Bosco College, Kohima, Nagaland - 797001, INDIA
  • Ms. Amenla Pongen Postgraduate Student (Sociology), Don Bosco College, Kohima, Nagaland - 797001, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.2.31

Keywords:

Political opinion formation, social media, Political participation, Identity politics, Political silence, Digital public sphere, Nagaland, Qualitative research

Abstract

Political opinion formation in contemporary society is increasingly shaped by digital media, identity, and socio-cultural factors. This study examines how political opinions are formed and expressed in Kohima, Nagaland. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected from 50 respondents through interviews and questionnaires and analyzed using thematic analysis.

The findings indicate that political awareness is largely influenced by passive exposure to social media, where algorithmic curation reinforces existing beliefs. Emotional engagement plays a key role in shaping attention, while perceptions of protest reflect concerns related to inequality and governance. Regional identity significantly influences political loyalty, often coexisting with a negotiated national identity. Despite increased exposure to political content, expression is frequently constrained by fear of social judgment, cultural norms, and digital risks, resulting in self-censorship.

The study demonstrates that political opinion formation is a multidimensional process shaped by digital exposure, identity, and social constraints, highlighting a paradox in which increased connectivity does not necessarily lead to greater political participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baruah, S. (2005). Durable disorder: Understanding the politics of Northeast India. Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Chandra, K. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. Cambridge University Press.

Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the “spiral of silence”. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Sullivan, Y. W. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435–495. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Wutich, A., & Beresford, M. (2024). Qualitative methods in social research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234567

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Kavahru, A., Solo, M., Pienyu, P., Sangtam, A. L., & Pongen, A. (2026). Digital Public Sphere, Identity, and Silence: A Qualitative Multi-Study Analysis of Political Opinion Formation in Kohima, Nagaland. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.2.31

Issue

Section

Articles