A Study on the Economic Impact of Human-Animal Conflict on Selected Farmers in Sathyamangalam Forest Range of Erode District

Authors

  • Dr. R. Manikandan Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  • M. Tamilarasi Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, INDIA. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4251-7119
  • K. Sowmitha Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  • R. Keerthi Kumar Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.
  • M. Preethi Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.3.22

Keywords:

human - wildlife conflict, crop and livestock loss, property damage, mitigation strategies , compensation measures

Abstract

The negative interactions between human and wildlife leads to certain losses such as crop loss, property damage, livestock loss and loss of human lives is known as human – wildlife conflict. This study attempts to analyse the economic impact of human – wildlife conflict on farming communities living nearer to the Sathyamangalam forest range of Erode District, Tamil Nadu. The main objectives of the study are to examine the loss and damage value of crop, cattle, fencing and agricultural equipment and the effectiveness of compensation provided by the government to the affected farmers. There are two villages namely Pudhukuyyanur and Pudhuvadavalli in Sathyamangalam taluk of Erode District have been selected for this study. The snow ball sampling technique has been used to collect the primary data. Totally 43 samples were collected, from that 21 samples from Pudhukuyyanur and 22 samples from Pudhuvadavalli were derived. The study found that frequency of attacks is higher in Pudhukuyyanur, where incidents occur regularly throughout the year, while in Pudhuvadavalli, conflicts are relatively less frequent but more seasonal, particularly during summer. The most affected crops due to human – wild life conflict are banana and maize and the major animals responsible for the conflict are elephants and wild boars. The study concluded that farming communities living nearer to the forest areas are most affected due to human – wildlife conflicts. The existing mitigation strategies and compensation measures are ineffective to reduce these problems. The study suggested that there is a need for improved compensation schemes, stronger preventive measures, increased awareness and coordination between farmers and forest officials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. S. Meshram, & R. B. Meshram. (2023). HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT IN INDIA: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND REMEDIES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 4742 –4745. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.5634

Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A., & Jadhav, S. (2013). The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological conservation, 157, 309-316.

Dangol, D., Ghimire, A., & Bhattarai, S. B. (2020). Human-elephant conflict in the buffer zone of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Zoology, 4(1), 36-43.

Gross, E. M., Jayasinghe, N., Dahal, S., Tenzin, S., Klenzendorf, S., Vannelli, K., ... & Kinnaird, M. F. (2025). C2C—conflict to coexistence: A global approach to manage human–wildlife conflict for coexistence. Conservation Science and Practice, 7(2), e13292.

Gulati, S., Karanth, K. K., Le, N. A., & Noack, F. (2021). Human casualties are the dominant cost of human–wildlife conflict in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e1921338118.

https://iucn.org/resources/issues-brief/human-wildlife-conflict

https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2019/08/03-CSS-Guidelines.pdf

Madhusudan, M. D. (2003). Living amidst large wildlife: livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, South India. Environmental management, 31(4), 0466-0475.

Matseketsa, G., Muboko, N., Gandiwa, E., Kombora, D. M., & Chibememe, G. (2019). An assessment of human-wildlife conflicts in local communities bordering the western part of Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00737.

Wangchuk, S., Bond, J., Thwaites, R., & Finlayson, M. (2023). Exploring human–wildlife conflict and implications for food self-sufficiency in Bhutan. Sustainability, 15(5), 4175.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Manikandan, R., Tamilarasi, M., Sowmitha, K., Kumar, R. K., & Preethi, M. (2026). A Study on the Economic Impact of Human-Animal Conflict on Selected Farmers in Sathyamangalam Forest Range of Erode District. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.3.22

Issue

Section

Articles