The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade Openness in Afghanistan: An ARDL Approach

Authors

  • Zubin Khaja Ahmadi Teaching Assistant, Department of National Economy, Faculty of Economics, Balkh University, AFGHANISTAN https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2552-6910
  • Yaqub Ali Rabin Teaching Assistant, Department of National Economy, Faculty of Economics, Balkh University, AFGHANISTAN
  • Samiullah Samim Senior Teaching Assistant, Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Economics, Balkh University, AFGHANISTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.1

Keywords:

ARDL Model, Bounds Test, Economy of Afghanistan, Exchange Rate Volatility, Trade Openness

Abstract

This study investigates the short-term and long-term impacts of exchange rate volatility on trade openness (TO) in Afghanistan over the period 1980–2024. This applied research employs an analytical econometric approach. To capture the dynamic interactions among exchange rate volatility (measured via a moving standard deviation), economic growth (control variable), and trade openness, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach was utilized. Annual data were gathered from reputable international and domestic sources, including UNCTAD, the World Bank, and Da Afghanistan Bank, and analyzed using EViews 13. While unit root tests confirmed a combination of level and first-difference stationarity among the variables, the bounds test found no statistical evidence of a stable, long-term equilibrium relationship. Short-term dynamics modeled through ARDL (1,3,0) revealed that the contemporaneous effect of exchange rate volatility, alongside its first and second lags, had no statistically significant impact on trade openness. However, the third lag of exchange rate volatility showed a positive and statistically significant impact at the 5% level (67.56), a finding further validated by the Wald test. Additionally, the Granger causality test indicated a unidirectional causal relationship running from trade openness to economic growth. Diagnostic tests (Breusch-Godfrey, Ramsey RESET, and Jarque-Bera) confirmed the absence of functional misspecification and verified the validity of the model's estimates. The findings demonstrate that the impact of exchange rate volatility on Afghanistan's trade openness is neither immediate nor long-term; rather, it manifests positively with a three-year lag. This delay underscores that adjusting contracts, prices, and trade decisions in response to exchange rate uncertainty is a time-consuming process for local businesses. Consequently, policy recommendations include proactive exchange rate management by the central bank to mitigate transactional risks, alongside developing domestic production supply chains and diversifying export products to strengthen the country's economic competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, Z. K., Rabin, Y. A., & Qadamshahi, H. R. (2025). The impact of trade openness on economic growth of South Asian countries. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 37-50.

Alam, S., Ahmed, Q. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). The effect of exchange rate volatility on Pakistan’s bilateral exports to major recipients. Global Business Review, 19(2), 328-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713539

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Arize, A. C. (2020). On the asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: evidence from Africa. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(4), 913-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1543582

Bahmani‐Oskooee, M., & Baek, J. (2021). On the asymmetric effects of exchange‐rate volatility on trade flows: Evidence from Korea‐US commodity trade. Australian Economic Papers, 60(4), 594-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12221

Bahmani‐Oskooee, M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2021). On the asymmetric effects of exchange‐rate volatility on trade flows: Evidence from US–UK Commodity Trade. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 68(1), 51-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12257

Calderón, C., & Kubota, M. (2018). Does higher openness cause more real exchange rate volatility?. Journal of International Economics, 110, 176-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.08.002

Da Afghanistan Bank. (2026). Currency Hijri and Meladi average. https://dab.gov.af/Currency-Hijri-Average

De Grauwe, P. (1988). Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in growth of international trade. Staff Papers, 35(1), 63-84.

Ekanayake, E. M., & Dissanayake, A. (2022). Effects of real exchange rate volatility on trade: empirical analysis of the United States exports to BRICS. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(2), 73.https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020073

Handoyo, R. D., Sari, A. D. P., Ibrahim, K. H., & Sarmidi, T. (2022). The volatility of rupiah exchange rate impact on main commodity exports to the OIC member states. Economies, 10(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040078

Hooper, P., & Kohlhagen, S. W. (1978). The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the prices and volume of international trade. Journal of international Economics, 8(4), 483-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(78)90001-8

Jabeen, S. (2025). The asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on UK–Pakistan trade flows: New evidence from nonlinear ARDL approach. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 34(2), 360-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2024.2379572

Kacaribu, F., Sabrina, S., & Hasan, T. M. R. (2021). Does the Service Trade Openness Mitigate Real Exchange Rate Volatility?. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 24(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.21098/BEMP.V24I2.1168

Kayani, U. N., Aysan, A. F., Gul, A., Haider, S. A., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Unpacking the asymmetric impact of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: A study of selected developed and developing Asian economies. Plos one, 18(10), e0291261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291261

Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International economics: Theory and policy (11th ed.). Pearson.

Lal, M., Kumar, S., Pandey, D. K., Rai, V. K., & Lim, W. M. (2023). Exchange rate volatility and international trade. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114156

Lee, C. H., Li, S. H., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). An asymmetric impact analysis of the exchange rate volatility on commodity trade between the US and China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 82, 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.07.002

Lin, S., Shi, K., & Ye, H. (2018). Exchange rate volatility and trade: The role of credit constraints. Review of Economic Dynamics, 30, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2018.05.002

Nguse, T., Oshora, B., Fekete-Farkas, M., Tangl, A., & Desalegn, G. (2021). Does the exchange rate and its volatility matter for international trade in Ethiopia?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120591

Roehling, A. (2021). Implications of exchange rate volatility for trade: Volatility measurement matters. Review of International Economics, 29(5), 1486-1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12550

Senadza, B., & Diaba, D. D. (2017). Effect of exchange rate volatility on trade in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African trade, 4(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2017.12.002

Shahab, M. J., Aslami, A., & Shahidi, J. A. (2020). Impact of exchange rate volatility on Afghanistan trade flows. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 8(12), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0812002

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2026). UNCTADstat data center. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/datacentre/dataviewer/US.TradeMerchTotal

World Bank. (2026). World Development Indicators. World Bank DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Ahmadi, Z. K., Rabin, Y. A., & Samim, S. (2026). The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade Openness in Afghanistan: An ARDL Approach. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.1