The Relationship between Literary Prose and Cognitive Linguistics

Authors

  • Rahmatullah Hakimi Senior Teaching Assistant, Department of Pashto, Faculty of Education, Paktika University, AFGHANISTAN
  • M. Rafiq Rafiq Professor Dr. M. Rafiq Rafiq, Department of Pashto, Faculty of Literature, Kabul University, AFGHANISTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.7

Keywords:

Aesthetics, Cognition, Cognitive Linguistics, Literary Prose

Abstract

In light of contemporary literary theories, literary prose has acquired numerous new aesthetic dimensions. One of these is the cognitive aspect of conceptualizing, renewing, enriching, and beautifying prose sentences, in which the reader’s cognition plays a central role. This study examines the role of cognition and mental processing in shaping the aesthetic appeal and impact of prose. It also explores how readers, through their cognitive abilities, contribute to the conceptualization and aesthetic appreciation of meaning. The intrinsic beauty of literary prose lies in the perceptions, interactions, and interpretations of both the writer and the reader. Various concepts in cognitive linguistics, such as conceptual metaphors, speech acts, Gestalt principles, and mental frameworks (schemas), facilitate the conceptualization and enhancement of meaning. Cognitive linguistics emerged as an interdisciplinary approach during the 1970s through the theoretical contributions of scholars such as Ronald Langacker and George Lakoff and subsequently extended its influence into many other fields of study. From this perspective, this article investigates the relationship between cognitive linguistics and literary prose. Scholars such as Langacker, Lakoff, and Ford have extensively discussed cognitive linguistics, while in Pashto, Ustad Khkulay has thoroughly explained the theory in his work Theories of Linguistics. However, the present study offers a different perspective by demonstrating that cognitive linguistics plays a significant role in both the conceptualization and aesthetic enhancement of literary prose.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, N. (2018). Patān (Novel). Jalalabad: Momand Publishing Society.

Ahmadi, N. (2013). Jojo (Novel). Nangarhar: Momand Publishing Society.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Translated by Carly Emerson & Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press.

Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hakimi, R. (2024). Aesthetic elements of Pashto literary prose. Kabul: Samoon Publishing Society.

Dawodzai, A. (2002). Literary endeavors. Peshawar: Danish Bookstore.

Rahmani, G. (2019). The garden of imagination. Kabul: Published on the occasion of the centenary celebration of Afghanistan’s independence.

Radi, M. (2005). The conduit metaphor. Translated by Farzan Sajoodi. In Metaphor: The basis of thought and a tool for creating beauty (Collection of Articles). Tehran.

Richards, I. A. (2003). The philosophy of rhetoric. Translated by Jalil Tajlil. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

Shpoon, S. (2005). Wu Na woo, yow Shpoon woo. Peshawar: Danish Publishing Society.

Khkalay, A. (2021). Enunciative linguistics. Kabul: Danish Publishing Society.

Khkulay, A. (2023). The study of Pashto grammar in the light of cognitive linguistics. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Pashto Language and Literature, Kabul University.

Khkulay, A. (2022). Theories of linguistics. Kabul: Paktus Publishing Society.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mogadam, M. D. (2008). Theoretical linguistics: The emergence and development of generative grammar. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Hakimi, R., & Rafiq, M. R. (2026). The Relationship between Literary Prose and Cognitive Linguistics. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(5), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.7

Most read articles by the same author(s)