"Jal, Jangal, Jamin" Slogan in Indian Tribes

Authors

  • Dr. Malay Kumar Bhoi Assistant Professor, Philosophy Programme, KISS Deemed to be University (KISS-DU), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, INDIA
  • Ramesh Birua Research Scholar, KISS Deemed to be University (KISS-DU), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.15

Keywords:

Jal-Jangal-Jameen, Tribalism, Movement, Natural resources

Abstract

In such a context, the sense-making of good quality lives are indistinguishable, and dominant development models are invisible the social and ecological consequences of seeing nature as a good to be produced. Most of the time they oppose the development of Indian economy's modern project in major tribal in their areas of the country.  Their main the slogan are “Jal, Jangal, Jamin” that signifies the opposing to colonial extraction system of natural resources from the tribal region and feudal land alienation. The slogan comes across as a kind of collective ancestral heritage. It represents an Adivasi epistemological perspective that is based on an ancestor way of feeling and making land, forests and water the lived and shared aspects of their being. The out-sider corporates conceptualising these elements as resources that can be bought, sold or go no end.

This view regards the removal of nature in the times of post- independence state. It is the unique economic instrumentalization of Nature and calls for the reciprocal stewardship, in which communities take up responsibility for their own environment. The persistence of the ancestral home territories is thus linked to collective identity of the tribes as well as their customary rule and ecological wellness. The primary slogan in this regard is “Jal, Jangal, Jamin”, translated as water, forest, agriculture. The primary slogan in this regard is “Jal, Jangal, Jamin” which means water, forest and agriculture, and which implies that land, water and forests are all evaluated as commodities. It instead validates an epistemology of interdependence, livelihoods and collective traditional knowledge based, which is Adivasi/ Tribal in nature. For this reason, the slogan is used as a conceptual framework to question about both the colonial and the feudal organisation whereas the slogan is based on the maintenance of nature. The enabled dispossession of the post-colonial idea’s that continue to development extractive natural resources without substantive tribal communities’ consent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikari, A., & Chhotray, V. (2020). The Political Construction of Extractive Regimes in Two Newly Created Indian States: A Comparative Analysis of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. Development and Change, 51(3), 843–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12583

Alier, J. M., & Shmelev, S. (2014). Between activism and science: grassroots concepts for sustainability coined by Environmental Justice Organizations. Journal of Political Ecology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/v21i1.21124

Amirthalingam, M. (2016). Sacred Groves of India – An Overview. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology, 3(4), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrbp.2016.304.011

Barman, K. (2025). A Jurisprudence of Place: The Potential of Indigenous Legal Traditions to Transform Environmental Law. National Journal of Environmental Law. https://doi.org/10.37591/njel.v8i2.1908

Bauer, K., Hinz, O., Aalst, W. M. P. van der, & Weinhardt, C. (2021). Expl (AI)n It to Me – Explainable AI and Information Systems Research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00683-2

Baviskar, A. (1997). Tribal Politics and Discourses of Environmentalism. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 31(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/006996697031002002

Becker, C. D., & Ghimire, K. (2003). Synergy Between Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Conservation Science Supports Forest Preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00582-080101

Bhadauriya, V. S., Singh, A., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2025). Resisting colonial and feudal oppression: the Bhil revolts in British Raj Rajasthan and their impact on India’s freedom movement. Discover Global Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00245-x

Bhumika, M., & Kumar, S. (2024). British Forest Laws in India: Disruption of Ecological Balance, Livelihoods, Traditions and Customs. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 21(7), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2024/v21i7854

Borde, R. (2022). The Politics and Poetics of Forested Sacred Natural Sites in East-Central India (pp. 23–35). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003143680-4

Bose, P. (2011). Forest tenure reform: exclusion of tribal women’s rights in semi-arid Rajasthan, India. The International Forestry Review, 13(2), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811797406615

Bose, P. (2023). Equitable land-use policy? Indigenous peoples’ resistance to mining-induced deforestation. Land Use Policy, 129, 106648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106648

Brittain, S., Alatorre, A., Bullough, L., & Newing, H. (2025). Enabling conditions for conservation on Indigenous and community lands. Conservation Biology, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70055

Chanu, E. P., & Daisuke, T. (2026). The role of deep ecology and traditional governance in the sustainable management of sacred groves: Insights from commons theory. Tropics. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.ms25-07

Chapin, M., Lamb, Z., & Threlkeld, B. (2005). MAPPING INDIGENOUS LANDS. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429

Choudhary, A., Sisodia, S. S., Bairathi, R., Upadhyay, B. M., Babu, S., & Baheti, B. L. (2025). Constraints Faced by Tribal Farmers in Seeking Livelihood Security through Forest Based Resources. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 31(6), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i63156

Choudhary, B. K. (2021). Diaspora within (pp. 375–386). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450310-32

Choudhury, C., & Aga, A. (2019). Manufacturing Consent: Mining, Bureaucratic Sabotage and the Forest Rights Act in India. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 31(2), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2019.1594326

Christopher, S., Shutzer, M., & Raile, Z. R. (2023). An Introduction To Tribal Ecologies In Modern India. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/da/publications/bd6e1634-52a4-4fbf-ba1b-f7704b1c4ede

Christopher, S., Shutzer, M., Raile, Z. R., Jeppesen, S., Bodil, F., Andersen, P. B., & Bach, K. M. (2023). Antinomies of Ecology and Scales of Tribal Development in India. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/da/publications/d4d6c257-6f2b-48bc-9d11-c7ce74d3d7aa

Damodaran, V., & Dasgupta, S. (2022). Special issue: Multiple worlds of the Adivasi. An introduction. Modern Asian Studies, 56(5), 1353–1374. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x22000361

Dattatray, S., Godage. (2025). Tribal Community Rights in Natural Resource–Driven Sustainable Development. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17870541

Davidsdottir, E. (2021). Our rights are carved in stone: the case of the Pathalgadi movement in Simdega, Jharkhand. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(7), 1111–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1878351

Davidsdottir, E. (2022). Open Access: Our rights are carved in stone: the case of the Pathalgadi movement in Simdega, Jharkhand (pp. 23–37). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003269458-3

Dawson, N., Coolsaet, B., Bhardwaj, A., Booker, F., Brown, D. F. M., Lliso, B., Loos, J., Martín, A., Oliva, M., Pascual, U., Sherpa, P. Y., & Worsdell, T. (2024). Is it just conservation? A typology of Indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ roles in conserving biodiversity. One Earth, 7(6), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.05.001

Dawson, N., Coolsaet, B., Sterling, E. J., Loveridge, R., D, G.-C. N., Wongbusarakum, S., Sangha, K. K., Scherl, L. M., Phan, H. P., Zafra‐Calvo, N., Lavey, W. G., Byakagaba, P., Idrobo, C. J., Chenet, A., Bennett, N., Mansourian, S., & Rosado-May, F. J. (2021). The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology and Society, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12625-260319

Deokar, M. A. (2025a). The Role of Gram Sabha in the Implementation of Forest Rights Act (2006) and the Achievement of Viksit Bharat 2047 Goals. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18159742

Deokar, M. A. (2025b). The Role of Gram Sabha in the Implementation of Forest Rights Act (2006) and the Achievement of Viksit Bharat 2047 Goals. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18159743

Dungdung, G., Padel, F., & Damodaran, V. (2022). And red flows the Koina river: Adivasi resistance to the ‘loot’ of their land and resources in eastern India, 1980–2020. Modern Asian Studies, 56(5), 1642–1671. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x22000099

Elias, M. (2017). Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states. In CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). CGIAR. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89106

Fabricius, C., Folke, C., Cundill, G., & Schultz, L. (2007). Powerless Spectators, Coping Actors, and Adaptive Co-managers: a Synthesis of the Role of Communities in Ecosystem Management. Ecology and Society, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02072-120129

Fanari, E. (2019). Relocation from protected areas as a violent process in the recent history of biodiversity conservation in India. Ecology Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v2i1.55

Fernandes, W. (2023). Land laws, development and globalisation in northeast India (pp. 23–36). https://doi.org/10.4324/b23112-3

Ghosh, B. N., & De, U. K. (2015). Women in natural resource collection: Experience from rural Jharkhand in India. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 1643, 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907483

Ghosh‐Jerath, S., Kapoor, R., Ghosh, U., Singh, A., Downs, S., & Fanzo, J. (2021). Pathways of Climate Change Impact on Agroforestry, Food Consumption Pattern, and Dietary Diversity Among Indigenous Subsistence Farmers of Sauria Paharia Tribal Community of India: A Mixed Methods Study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 667297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.667297

Goswami, S. (2023). Jal, Jungle, Zameen: Remembering Bhagwan Birsa Munda: A freedom fighter and tribal leader. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7608629

Grover, S., Swami, N., & Suresh, V. (2023). Governance Principles for a Just Energy Transition (pp. 119–134). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003433088-10

Gulzar, S., Lal, A., & Pasquale, B. (2023). Representation and Forest Conservation: Evidence from India’s Scheduled Areas. American Political Science Review, 118(2), 764–783. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423000758

Gupta, H. (2025). The Forest Rights Act: A perfect recipe for the Doom of India’s public forests? Biophilia Insights, 3(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.66005/bi.e202532002

Gupta, P., & Chowdhury, A. R. (2024). Can Social Mobilizations Democratize Forest Governance? The “Making” and “Unmaking” of India’s Forest Rights Act. Journal of Forest Economics, 39(1), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000573

Gupta, S. (2024). Does India’s Post-Colonial Land Acquisition Act Safeguard Farmer Interests? * (pp. 148–164). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003528425-12

Hembram, S. (2022). Evolution of Forest Policies and Implementation Status of FRA 2006 in India, with special reference to Jharkhand state. In Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2163590/v1

Initiative, R. and R., Vasundhara, & Consultants, N. R. M. (2015). Potential for Recognition of Community Forest Resource Rights Under India’s Forest Rights Act. https://doi.org/10.53892/ugvt5889

Jana, P., Pandey, R., Semeraro, T., Alatalo, J. M., Areteno, R., Todaria, N. P., & Tripathi, R. P. (2021). Community perspectives on conservation of water sources in Tarkeshwar sacred groves, Himalaya, India. Water Science & Technology Water Supply, 21(8), 4343–4354. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.181

Jangir, P., & Kumar, A. (2023). TRIBAL SURVIVAL IN THE URBANIZED WORLD: A PARADOX OF CHANGE. ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.2709

Jena, D., Swain, S., Mishra, P., Samantaray, S., Behera, M. R., & Mohanty, A. K. (2026). Assessing the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Forest Rights Act on Tribal Communities in Odisha: An Empirical Study of the Juang Tribe. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 16(2), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2026.16.2.51

Kapoor, I. (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? York University Digital Library (York University), 63(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0478

Kaur, N., MohleenKaur, Kaur, S., & Kaur, S. (2025). Legal And Indigenous Strategies For Advancing Biodiversity And Wildlife Conservation In India: A Comprehensive Analysis Of Contemporary Frameworks And Traditional Knowledge Systems. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3508–3514. https://doi.org/10.64252/satdb056

Kharat, R. S., Nargave, T., & Sisodia, K. (2026). Indian Knowledge Systems and Sustainable Development: The Role of Water, Forests and Land. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18773558

Kodiveri, A. (2025). Colonial Legacies and Decolonial Futures: Environmental Law and Indigenous Resistance in India. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 261–274). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035324408.00027

Kumari, J. (2025). Owning the Land: Significance of Tenancy Laws in Jharkhand. Artha - Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.72.5

Kutty, R., & Menon, A. (2025). Brokering Power: Bureaucratic Contestations in Participatory Forest Governance. Conservation and Society, 23(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_6_24

Kutty, R., & Setty, S. (2025). Power and Sensemaking in Radical Policy Implementation: A Case Study from Nagarhole National Park. Rural Landscapes Society Environment History, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/rl.132

Lalander, R., Singh, N., Galindo, J. F., Maganga, F., Sjöling, S., & Lehtilä, K. (2025). Comparative reflections on contested hydro-territorial rights in Indigenous communities of Bolivia, India and Tanzania. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101508

M., S., & E., M., de,. (2019). Media, Indigeneity and Nation in South Asia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424649

Macura, B., Zorondo‐Rodríguez, F., Satorras, M., Demps, K., Laval, M., García, C., & Reyes-García, V. (2011). Local Community Attitudes toward Forests Outside Protected Areas in India. Impact of Legal Awareness, Trust, and Participation. Ecology and Society, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-04242-160310

Maia, M. S. (2026). A Combining Global, Regional, and Local (Timor-Leste) Literature on Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) and Forest Governance. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery. https://doi.org/10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2026.2.2

Majumdar, K., Dhaske, G., & Chatterjee, D. (2025). Ecopolitics, Extractivism and Indigenous People: Development Paradox of the Asur Tribe in Jharkhand, India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 7(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026251367989

Mishra, N. (2025). GUARDIANS OF THE GREEN: TRIBAL WISDOM, LEGAL PATHWAYS, AND FOREST CONSERVATION IN INDIA (pp. 133–144). https://doi.org/10.58532/nbennurbjiksw11

MK, H., & Rani, M. (2009). "Environmentalism and Forest Rights of Tribals in Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada Districts of Karnataka ". Artha - Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.14.1

Mondal, A., & Pandey, M. S. (2024). Indigenous Festivals and Climate Sustainability in India: A Case Study of Cultural Practices and Performances. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v16n1.03

Muller, S., Hemming, S., & Rigney, D. (2019). Indigenous sovereignties: relational ontologies and environmental management. Geographical Research, 57(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12362

N.C., S. (1997). The saga of participatory forest management in India. In Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/000090

Noy, I. (2022). The politics of dispossession and compensation in the eastern Indian coal belt. Critique of Anthropology, 42(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x221074831

Oskarsson, P. (2018). Landlock: Paralysing Dispute over Minerals on Adivasi Land in India. In ANU Press eBooks. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/l.09.2018

Palita, S. K., & Panda, D. (2026). Sacred Groves in Indian Highlands (pp. 97–116). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003688907-7

Pandey, S., & Bajpai, S. (2025). THE GRAM SABHA AS A LEGAL FORUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: THE CASE OF COMMUNITY FOREST RIGHTS. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23, 262–278. https://doi.org/10.52152/ees41536

Paneque‐Gálvez, J., Vargas-Ramírez, N., Napoletano, B. M., & Cummings, A. R. (2017). Grassroots Innovation Using Drones for Indigenous Mapping and Monitoring. Land, 6(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6040086

Persha, L., Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2011). Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation. Science, 331(6024), 1606–1608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199343

Ramakrishnan, R. (2024). The Forest Rights Act and the 2023 Amendment to the Forest Conservation Act. Ecology Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal, 7(2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v7i2.1371

Robinson, S., Keats, J., Bracken, C., Ekstrom, M., Lin, A., McCauley-Pearl, A., & Supple, M. (2026). Reimagining the Sustainable Development Goals: Centering Nature’s rights for a more-than-human future. Sustainability Science, 21(3), 1275–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-026-01802-2

Sahoo, P. S., Bang, S., & Sahil, G. (2024). Forest Conservation and Development in India– An Analysis of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 and Its Impact on the Forest System. JURNAL CITA HUKUM, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i2.40530

Saikia, M. (2026). “Not a Single Leaf Is Meant to be Taken With You”: Conservation Motivations and Belief Systems in a Khasi Sacred Landscape of Meghalaya, India. Integrative Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.70065

Sarin, M. (1995). REGENERATING INDIA’S FORESTS: RECONCILING GENDER EQUITY WITH JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENT. IDS Bulletin, 26(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1995.mp26001012.x

Saxena, K. B. (2024). The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act 2023: A Threat to Forest Lands and Forest Dwellers. Social Change, 54(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857231222101

Singh, A. (2022). Pathalgadi Movement and Conflicting Ideologies of Tribal Village Governance (pp. 360–380). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299561-17

Singh, A. (2024). Adivasis as Ecological Warriors: Colonial Laws and Post-Colonial Adivasi Resistance in India’s Jharkhand. Genealogy, 8(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8040130

Singh, A. K. (2025). Decolonising Environmental Law through Legal Pluralism: Indigenous Tribal Knowledge Practices and the Quest for Environmental Justice in India. Journal of Native India and Diversity Studies, 2(3), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.62656/jnids.v2i3.47

Smith, D., Ibáñez, A., & Herrera, F. (2017). The Importance of Context: Assessing the Benefits and Limitations of Participatory Mapping for Empowering Indigenous Communities in the Comarca Ngäbe-Buglé, Panama. Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 52(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.52.1.3574

Tirkey, N. N., Ekka, K. T., Soren, S., & Soren, S. (2024). Adivasi Women, Sacred Groves and Religious Practices: Unveiling the Epistemic Injustice in the East-Central Belt of India. Sociological Bulletin, 73(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229241287432

Tripathy, A. (2025). A Comparative Study of the Rhetoric of Inclusion in Electoral Campaigns and Governance: Case Study of Tribal Inclusion in Odisha. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 10(6), 2365–2381. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2025.v10i06.028

Varughese, R., & Mukherjee, S. (2024). Development-induced dispossession: Adivasi existence in the milieu of contemporary Indian texts in translation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03166-3

Vijge, M. J. (2016). Carbonizing forest governance: analyzing the consequences of REDD+ for multilevel forest governance. https://doi.org/10.18174/376514

Villamayor‐Tomás, S., & García-López, G. (2018). Social movements as key actors in governing the commons: Evidence from community-based resource management cases across the world. Global Environmental Change, 53, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.005

Yenneti, K., Day, R., & Golubchikov, O. (2016). Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: Dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum, 76, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.004

Zhang, Y., West, P., Thakholi, L., Suryawanshi, K., Supuma, M., Straub, D., Sithole, S. S., Sharma, R., Schleicher, J., Ruli, B., Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, D., Rasmussen, M. B., Ramenzoni, V. C., Qin, S., Pugley, D. D., Palfrey, R., Oldekop, J. A., Nuesiri, E., Nguyen, V. T. H., … Agyei, F. K. (2023). Governance and Conservation Effectiveness in Protected Areas and Indigenous and Locally Managed Areas. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48(1), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-081348

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Bhoi, D. M. K., & Birua, R. (2026). "Jal, Jangal, Jamin" Slogan in Indian Tribes. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(5), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.15