To Analysis Various Factors as a Conclusion for the Success and Failure of the Village Panchayats

Authors

  • Lokendra Kumar Singh Associate Professor, Agricultural Extension, Janta Vedic College Baraut, Baghpat, U.P., INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.6.25

Keywords:

Village Panchayat, Gram Shabha, Construction work

Abstract

The present study counduted in Baghpat district in 2014. District Baghpat is one of the district of Uttar Pradesh, to measure the opinion of respondents found Majority i.e. 89.67%, 85.00%, 70.33% and 54.00% respondents have  mentioned that they are aware regarding, construction of house, toilet for poor people, construction of drainage, Panchayat Building and boundary wall of school, as a rural development work done by the Village Panchayat. As regards health and sanitation work data reveals majority i.e. 85.33%, 68.67%, 54.67% and 53.33% respondents have shown their awareness regarding work done by the Village Panchayat, vaccination for the prevention of polio, diarrhea and smallpox, de siltation of Village ponds, specially making Villagers to aware family planning and Removal of waste product respectively.

Maximum i.e. 60.67%, 54.67%, 45.67%, 40.00% and 39.33% respondents were well acquainted so far the work for economic development by the Village Panchayat is concerned with special reference to arrangement of loan and pension for the poor, to trained village people for self employment, to organized self help group, to start fish production in village ponds, and to give village land on lease. Further revealed majority i.e. 70.33%, 63.00%, 61.33% 55.33% and 54.33% respondents in case of Gram Sabha and Village Panchayat had shown unhappiness so far as the work for agriculture development is carried out by the Village Panchayat with special reference to arrangement for improved agriculture equipment for villager, to arrange meetings of block officers and K.V.K. in village, to arrange for soil testing, arrange for seeds, fertilizer on cheap rate from co-operative store for villager and to arranged for vaccination to prevent animal disease of the respondents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Allahyari, M.S. Alipour, H. Chbok, R.G. (2010). Healthy Village Co-operative: An approach towards Rural Development. Scientific Research and Essays. 5:19, 2867-

Babiskar, B.S. (2009). Including the Excluded: Empowering the Powerless through Panchayati Raj in Maharashtra. Inclusion and exclusion in local Governance: field Studies from Rural India. 19-41. 1

Brahmi, M.K. Sehgal, R.N. (2008). Factors Affecting People's Participation in Conservation of Common Property Resources in JFMCs of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Forester. 134: 6, 757-764. 6

Durgaprasad, P. Sivram, P. (2007). Good Governance and HRD: Case Studies of User Managed Drinking Water and Health Projects in India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development.17:1/95-112.12.

Kumar, K. A. Nanjappa, d. Gowda, K.N. Ganesamoorthi,s. (2009). Problems and Suggestion of the Beneficiaries of Better and Poor Performing Gram Panchayats of Karnataka. Gaurav society of Agricultural Research Information centre 10:3, 759-762.6

Malik, A. S. (2008). Village Panchayats Common lands. International Journal of Rural Managements. 2008. 4: 1, 237-252.

Pramathesh Ambasta Shanker, P. S. V. Mihir Shah. (2008). Two Years of NREGA: The Road Ahead. Economic and Political Weekly.43:8, 41-50.14

Raghav Gaiha (2000). Do Ante Poverty Progrmmes reach the Rural Poor in India. Oxford Development Studies. 28:1, 71 -95.67

Sumathi, S. Sudarsen, V. ( 2005). What does the New Panchayat System Guarantee? A Case Study of Pappapatti. Economic and Political Weekly.. 40: 34, 3751-3758. 8.

Sylendra, H.S. Rajput, S. S. (2010) Role of Panchayats in the Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSSs): Issues and Evidence. Working Paper Institute of Rural Management (Anand). 219, 55

Downloads

Published

2023-12-24

How to Cite

Singh, L. K. (2023). To Analysis Various Factors as a Conclusion for the Success and Failure of the Village Panchayats. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 3(6), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.6.25