The Pallathadka-Debroy Theory of Community Health Engagement: A Paradigm Shift for Primary Healthcare Transformation in Resource-Limited Settings

Authors

  • Prof. Dr. Harikumar Pallathadka Vice-Chancellor & Professor, Manipur International University, Imphal, Manipur, INDIA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0705-9035
  • Prof. Dr. Parag Deb Roy Social Scientist & Independent Researcher, Guwahati, Assam, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.3.51

Keywords:

Community participation, health systems theory, primary healthcare, community engagement, health equity, resource-limited settings

Abstract

This review examines the theoretical contributions of the Pallathadka-Debroy Theory of Community Health Engagement (PDTCHE), a novel conceptual framework that addresses longstanding challenges in community participation within primary healthcare systems. Through a systematic analysis of its foundational principles, theoretical antecedents, and conceptual innovations, this paper positions the PDTCHE as a significant advancement in understanding the dynamics of community engagement in resource-limited settings. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from public health, social sciences, and systems thinking, we evaluate the theory's three core elements: Structural Integration, Functional Responsiveness, and Dynamic Equilibrium. The paper explores how these elements collectively create a more nuanced and operationally relevant framework than previous participation models. We further assess the theory's contributions to addressing power asymmetries, sustainability challenges, and implementation gaps that have undermined earlier community participation efforts. This critical examination reveals that the PDTCHE offers both theoretical depth and practical utility, providing researchers, policymakers, and practitioners with conceptual tools to design more effective, equitable, and sustainable community engagement initiatives in primary healthcare systems. The theory's emphasis on the continuum of participation and its correlation with health outcomes represents a paradigm shift in how we conceptualize and implement community engagement in global health contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abelson, J., Forest, P. G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57(2), 239-251.

Abimbola, S., & Pai, M. (2020). Will global health survive its decolonisation? The Lancet, 396(10263), 1627-1628.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Atun, R., De Jongh, T., Secci, F., Ohiri, K., & Adeyi, O. (2010). A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. Health Policy and Planning, 25(1), 1-14.

Bath, J., & Wakerman, J. (2015). Impact of community participation in primary health care: What is the evidence? Australian Journal of Primary Health, 21(1), 2-8.

Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 255-270.

Cleary, S. M., Molyneux, S., & Gilson, L. (2013). Resources, attitudes and culture: An understanding of the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms in primary health care settings. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 320.

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking 'participation': Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269-283.

Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

George, A. S., Mehra, V., Scott, K., & Sriram, V. (2015). Community participation in health systems research: A systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0141091.

Gilson, L. (2012). Health policy and systems research: A methodology reader. World Health Organization.

Gilson, L., Lehmann, U., & Schneider, H. (2017). Practicing governance towards equity in health systems: LMIC perspectives and experience. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 171.

Kenny, A., Hyett, N., Sawtell, J., Dickson-Swift, V., Farmer, J., & O'Meara, P. (2013). Community participation in rural health: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 64.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Marston, C., Renedo, A., & Miles, S. (2020). Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. The Lancet, 395(10238), 1676-1678.

Mehl, G., & Labrique, A. (2014). Prioritizing integrated mHealth strategies for universal health coverage. Science, 345(6202), 1284-1287.

Napier, A. D., Ancarno, C., Butler, B., Calabrese, J., Chater, A., Chatterjee, H., ... & Woolf, K. (2014). Culture and health. The Lancet, 384(9954), 1607-1639.

Paina, L., & Peters, D. H. (2012). Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy and Planning, 27(5), 365-373.

Pallathadka, H., & Debroy, P. (2025). Theory of Community Health Engagement: A conceptual framework for primary healthcare transformation in resource-limited settings. Unpublished manuscript, Manipur International University.

Rifkin, S. B. (2009). Lessons from community participation in health programmes: A review of the post Alma-Ata experience. International Health, 1(1), 31-36.

Rifkin, S. B. (2014). Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: A review of the literature. Health Policy and Planning, 29(suppl_2), ii98-ii106.

Rifkin, S. B., Muller, F., & Bichmann, W. (1988). Primary health care: On measuring participation. Social Science & Medicine, 26(9), 931-940.

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.

Sheikh, K., Gilson, L., Agyepong, I. A., Hanson, K., Ssengooba, F., & Bennett, S. (2011). Building the field of health policy and systems research: Framing the questions. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001073.

Tritter, J. Q., & McCallum, A. (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 76(2), 156-168.

Wallerstein, N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Empowerment education: Freire's ideas adapted to health education. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 379-394.

World Health Organization (WHO). (1978). Declaration of Alma-Ata: International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6-12 September 1978. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2008). The world health report 2008: Primary health care now more than ever. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Transforming and scaling up health professionals' education and training: World Health Organization guidelines 2013. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Declaration of Astana: Global Conference on Primary Health Care, Astana, Kazakhstan, 25-26 October 2018. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

Pallathadka, H., & Roy, P. D. (2025). The Pallathadka-Debroy Theory of Community Health Engagement: A Paradigm Shift for Primary Healthcare Transformation in Resource-Limited Settings. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.3.51

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>