The Use of Transitional Devices in the Writing of ESL Learners: A Case of Bolgatanga Girls’ SHS Students’ Essays

Authors

  • Joshua Agbovoe Bolgatanga Girls Senior High School, GHANA
  • James Zinteng McCoy College of Education, GHANA
  • Ofosua Docia Koforidua Senior High Technical School, GHANA
  • Boadi Thomas Nkenkaasu Senior High School, GHANA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.3.59

Keywords:

Transitional devices, appear, students, writing, senior high school

Abstract

This paper investigated the use of transitional devices by students of Bolgatanga Girls Senior High School. The objective set for the research was to identify the kind of transitional devices that appear in the writing of senior high school students. To achieve this objective, the researcher employed a case study approach. The researcher used interviews and observation of students’ scripts for the collection of the data for the research. Essays of students were sampled for the extraction of the transitional devices used by the students. The data that was obtained was analysed based on the themes that emerged from the research question. The findings of the study showed that Bolgatanga Girls’ Senior High School students used transitional devices of different categories in their writing tasks. The findings of the study revealed that the students contextually and semantically used connective devices appropriately, which make their essays to achieve coherence and cohesion. It was shown by the study that even though the students used the connective devices appropriately, they overused some of the transitional devices, while they avoided some. The study also showed that compound connective devices were sometimes misspelled by the students by writing them as separate words. The findings indicated that teachers of English language placed too much emphasis on the external examination; they also employed teacher-centred methods in teaching; they do not adopt process approach to teaching transitional devices to the students and the students also failed to undertake reading task on their own. The study recommended that teachers of English should teach transitional devices as a distinct topic and adopt a learner-centred approach to teaching transitional devices to their students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, K. N. S. (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students' argumentative essay. Journal of English Language and Literature, 2(5),

Anderson, G. (2014). So, Transitions: Linking Adverbial Use of University ESL Students. The CATESOL Journal, 26(1)

Astanti, R., Rozimela, Y., & Fitrawati, F. (2016). Cohesive devices in discussion text written by the students of Sman 12 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 32-39.

Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. & Finegan E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.

Bikeliene, D. (2013). Transitional devices in academic writing: A study of ESL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 87-102.

Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research method (5th edn). Sage Publication.

Chanyoo, N. (2018). Cohesive devices and academic writing quality of Thai undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(5), 994-1101.

Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morrison, K (2007). Research methods in education (6th edn). Ruutledge.

Denscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide for small scale social research projects. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Don, Z. M. & Sriniwass, S. (2017) Conjunctive adjuncts in Malaysian undergraduate ESL essays: frequency and manner of use. Moderna språk, 1: 99–117.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers?. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Halliday M.A.K., Hassan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Hayford, S. K. (2013). Special educational needs and quality education for all. Salt and Light.

Janulienė, A. and Dziedravičius, J. (2015) On the use of conjunctive adverbs in learners’ academic essays. Verbum, 6, 69–83.

Jones, A. (2010). Types of connectives in discourse: A conceptual framework. In K. Smith & L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 201-220). Cambridge University Press.

Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33(4), 623-636. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005. 02.002

Liu, D. (2008). Linking adverbials. An across register corpus study and its implications International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (4). 491-518.

Liu, M., & Braine, A. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science.

Maurer, D. W. (2006). Transitions in writing and speech: An empirical analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Mensah, G. (2014). Cohesion in the essays of final year senior high school students in Accra Academy. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Ghana, Legon.

Nippold, M. A., Schwarz, I. E., & Undlin, M. B. (1992). Adverbial adjuncts in discourse production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1120-1131. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3506.1120

Oshima, A. and Hogue, A. (2006) Writing Academic English, Level 4, 4th ed. The Longman Academic Writing Series. Pearson Education, Inc.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing. Pearson/Longman.

Owu-Ewie, C. (2009). The language policy of education in Ghana and Linguistic Human Rights. Languages and Linguistics 24, 53-68.

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Complex nature of discourse markers: Challenges for L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.02.002

Seken, Y., & Suarnajaya, I. (2013). Non-native learners of English: Inappropriate use of connective devices affecting essay coherence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.04.002

Singchai, P., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2018). Cohesion in narrative essay writing of EFL secondary students in Thailand.

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). Sage.

Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Sage.

Taboada, M. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(4), 574-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.008

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. doi:10.1177/2345678906292430

Vincela, Z. (2013). Linking adverbials in the corpus of student-composed texts. Zmogus ir zodis (Man and the Word), 15(1), 215-222.

Virtanen, T. (2004). Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse. Mouton de Gruyter, 79-97.

Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2003). Academic writing: From paragraph to essay. Macmillan Education

Downloads

Published

2025-06-29

How to Cite

Agbovoe, J., Zinteng, J., Docia, O., & Thomas, B. (2025). The Use of Transitional Devices in the Writing of ESL Learners: A Case of Bolgatanga Girls’ SHS Students’ Essays. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(3), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.3.59

Issue

Section

Articles