Material Actors in Remote Interpreting: Practical Applications of Actor–Network Theory (ANT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.1.6Keywords:
Remote Interpreting, Material Actors, Actor–Network Theory (ANT), Interpreting Technology, Human–Nonhuman InteractionAbstract
This study, based on Actor–Network Theory (ANT), explores the mechanisms through which material actors operate in remote interpreting. The research finds that material actors—such as technological devices, environmental factors, and network platforms—play a crucial role in remote interpreting, not only affecting the accuracy and fluency of interpretation but also profoundly shaping interpreters’ work experiences and cognition. By analyzing the interactions between material actors, interpreters, clients, and other non-human actors, the study reveals the direct impact of equipment quality, platform stability, and usability on interpreting outcomes. At the same time, interpreters’ experience and skills help them adapt to equipment characteristics, mitigating potential issues that could affect interpreting quality. This study is the first to introduce the concept of material actors from ANT into the field of remote interpreting, providing a new theoretical perspective and methodological approach, as well as offering practical guidance for improving interpreting practice. Future research could expand scenarios and adopt interdisciplinary methods to more comprehensively understand the complex role of material actors in remote interpreting.
Downloads
References
Han, Q. (2017). Key concepts in Western literary theory: The material turn. Foreign Literature, (6), 88–99.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, pp. 1–264.
Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–316.
Pöchhacker, F. (2015). Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. Routledge.
Ren, W., & Xu, H. (2013). Field, habitus, and capital in community interpreting: A sociological perspective on interpreting research. Chinese Translators Journal, 34(5), 16–22, 128.
Ren, W., & Xu, H. (2015). Interpreting issues involving minority languages in China’s public service sector: Based on Bourdieu’s field theory. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 36(2), 34–40.
Wang, X., & Wang, B. (2021). New trends in the interpreting industry: Mainstream remote conference interpreting platforms and their technologies. Chinese Translators Journal, 42(5), 105–112.
Watson, K., Millei, Z., & Petersen, E. B. (2015). ‘Special’ non-human actors in the ‘inclusive’ early childhood classroom: The wristband, the lock and the scooter board. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(3), 266–278.
Xing, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2019). The utility of Latour’s actor-network theory for translation studies. Chinese Translators Journal, 40(5), 28–36, 188.
Xing, J. (2023). How is the new paradigm possible? Exploring the theoretical foundation of social translation studies. Shanghai Translation, (5), 6–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gao Wangqi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.















