Examination Anxiety and Problem-Solving Ability of Secondary Students in Relation to Gender and Type of School

Authors

  • Shashi Kala Research Scholar, Department of Education, IIMT University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • Dr. Sudha Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Education, IIMT University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.2.13

Keywords:

Examination Anxiety, Problem-Solving Ability, Secondary Students, Academic Performance

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between examination anxiety and problem-solving ability among secondary-level students. The study also explores differences based on gender. A sample of 160 secondary school students was selected using a random sampling method. Standardized tools were used to measure examination anxiety and problem-solving ability. Statistical techniques such as mean, standard deviation, t-test, and correlation were used for data analysis. The results indicate that students experience a high level of examination anxiety, while their problem-solving ability ranges from moderate to high. The findings further reveal that both male and female students exhibit significant levels of examination anxiety. However, no significant difference was found between students with high and low problem-solving ability in relation to examination anxiety. The study highlights the need for effective strategies to reduce examination anxiety and enhance students’ problem-solving skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Martin V. Covington. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171–200.

Moshe Zeidner. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.

Judith L. Meece., & Janet S. Eccles. (2006). Motivation and achievement. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 105–120.

Herbert W. Marsh., & Rhonda G. Craven. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 255–286.

Richard E. Mayer. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.

Robert J. Sternberg. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge University Press.

Albert Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

John W. Santrock. (2011). Educational psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Barry J. Zimmerman. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

Richard M. Ryan., & Edward L. Deci. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

Jerome Bruner. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

George Polya. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Anita Woolfolk. (2010). Educational psychology (11th ed.). Pearson Education.

David H. Schunk. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education.

Benjamin S. Bloom. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Kala, S., & Sharma, S. (2026). Examination Anxiety and Problem-Solving Ability of Secondary Students in Relation to Gender and Type of School. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 6(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.2.13

Issue

Section

Articles