Application of Foreign Law in Private International Law, Its Limitations, and Its Status under Afghanistan Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.6.5.24Keywords:
Private International Law, Conflict of Laws, Foreign Law, Application of Foreign Law, Proof of Foreign Law, Interpretation of Foreign Law, Public Order, AfghanistanAbstract
The application of foreign law in private international law becomes particularly important when a foreign element exists in a legal relationship or case and, as a result of a conflict of laws, the law of a particular country is determined to be applicable. In such cases, it is not sufficient for the judge merely to determine the applicable law; rather, the identification of the foreign law, the establishment of its validity and content, its interpretation, the conditions for its application, and its compatibility with public order and public morals are also important legal issues. The importance of this subject lies in the fact that the laws of different countries vary in their content, interpretation, and conditions of application, and national courts must observe the rules of conflict of laws when applying foreign law. The primary objective of this study is to explain the concept, conditions, limitations, and legal status of the application of foreign law in private international law in Afghanistan. The study specifically examines the identification of foreign law, the necessity of referring to foreign law, the proof and interpretation of foreign law, and the issue of determining the compatibility of ordinary foreign law with the constitution of the country in which it originates. Furthermore, the approaches of different legal systems concerning reference to foreign law, particularly those of Germany, England, and France, are examined. This study employs a descriptive-analytical and library-based research methodology. For the analysis of the subject, the Civil Code and Constitution of Afghanistan, legal sources on private international law, and relevant jurisprudential and legal works have been utilized. Article 32 of the Afghan Civil Code of 1976 provides for reference to the rules of private international law in cases of conflict of laws, while Article 34 addresses the application of the substantive provisions of foreign law in cases where the application of foreign law is prescribed. Furthermore, Article 35 of the Civil Code establishes an important limitation on the application of foreign law by providing that foreign law may be applied in Afghanistan only to the extent that it does not conflict with public order or public morals in Afghanistan. The findings of the study indicate that legal systems differ in their approaches to the application of foreign law. In some legal systems, the judge bears the responsibility for identifying and applying the applicable foreign law, whereas in others, the burden of proving foreign law rests upon the parties to the dispute. The role of the judge and legal experts in interpreting foreign law also varies according to the respective legal systems. In Afghanistan, specific and detailed rules concerning the identification and interpretation of foreign law have not been clearly established. Therefore, the general rules of conflict of laws and relevant legal sources are of particular importance in this area.
The study concludes that the application of foreign law in Afghanistan is dependent upon the rules of conflict of laws, the establishment of the validity and content of the foreign law, its proper interpretation, and, in particular, its compatibility with public order and public morals. Therefore, there is a need for a clear legal mechanism governing the application of foreign law, specifying the procedures for its identification and proof, and further clarifying the powers and responsibilities of judges. Such measures would contribute to legal certainty, justice, and the validity of judicial decisions in cases involving private international law.
Downloads
References
Abdulaziz, M. (1980). Perfection of civil codification in light of judicial decisions and jurisprudence (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Maktabat Nadi al-Qudah.
Al-Jarhaji, M. W. (2000). Civil cassation. Maktabat Rijal al-Qudah.
Al-Masri, N. A. (1973). Conflict of laws (3rd ed.). Daneshgahi Publishing.
Fawcett, J. J., Carruthers, J. M., & North, P. (Eds.). (2008). Cheshire, North & Fawcett: Private international law (14th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fentiman, R. (1998). Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.001.0001
Fentiman, R. (1998). Party choice and proof. In Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law (pp. 142–158). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.003.0004
Fentiman, R. (1998). Principle, policy, and reform. In Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law (pp. 286–315). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.003.0010
Fentiman, R. (1998). Proof by experts. In Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law (pp. 173–202). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.003.0006
Fentiman, R. (1998). Replacing party experts. In Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law (pp. 219–264). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.003.0008
Fentiman, R. (1998). The role of foreign law. In Foreign law in English courts: Pleading, proof and choice of law (pp. 23–59). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258780.003.0002
Maliji, A. (2000). Commentary on the Code of Civil Procedure (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Matabi‘ Rose al-Yusuf.
Nasih, W. M. (2013). Private international law (1st ed.). Saeed Publications.
Nasih, W. M. (2018). Private international law (4th ed.). Saeed Publications.
Nasiri, M. (1991). Multinational law (1st ed.). Nashr-e Danesh-e Emruz.
Madani, S. J. (1993). Private international law (2nd ed.). Ketabkhaneh-ye Ganj-e Danesh.
Seljuqi, M. (1998). Private international law: Conflict of laws (2nd ed.). Dadgostar Publishing.
Ward, T., & Plenderleith Ferguson, A. (2024). Proof of foreign law: A reduced role for expert evidence? Journal of Private International Law, 20(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2024.2347720
Ministry of Justice of Afghanistan. (1976). Civil Code of Afghanistan, Volume I. Official Gazette No. 353.
Ministry of Justice of Afghanistan. (2003). Constitution of Afghanistan. Official Gazette No. 818.
Bershtein, E. (1985). Enforcement of foreign court judgments by state and federal courts of the United States (M. J. Mir Fakhrayi, Trans.). Legal Journal, 2. Office of Legal Services.
FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v. Brownlie, [2021] UKSC 45 (United Kingdom Supreme Court 2021). https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2021/45.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Shafiq Mandozai, Amanullah Zadran, Matiullah Weqar, Momin Mubarez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.















